On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:02:07 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an > > > instrument API must not support it? > > > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies > > that LADSPA will still be simpler. > > yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to > ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
Me too, not a very good name. Your more immediate problem is making it easy for a LADSPA host to host [insert name here] plugins. There are a lot of LADSPA hosts, and zero [...] hosts. - Steve
