David Olofson wrote: >On Tuesday 10 December 2002 01.07, Tim Goetze wrote: >> Steve Harris wrote: >> >Linuxsampler is using a similar approach, but its not blockless >> > (and it wouldn't be noticably better if it was). >> > >> >Still if anyone ever wants to tackle this they can have a fair >> > chunk of my spare brain cycles. >> >> if it's going to run blockless, we'll need all your spare >> cpu cycles as well i'm afraid. >> >> ;) tim > >Not if it generates machine code. That way, it could (theoretically)
in realtime? we'll need everybodies' spare cpu cycles! ;) tim
