On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:51:58 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > Hmm... IIRC, someone initially misunderstood my design and thought > the VVIDs were a common resource maintaned by the host.
That was me I think. Which is why I though it was a good idea :) > This is optional for plugins, of course. The VVID is now not just > Channel unique, but *host* unique, so you can still use the actual > value for mark/search. Yup, seems OK to me. I'm still not quite sure about handing on allocations to a "sub" instrument. Well, actually, I'm not sure why its neccesary. - Steve
