On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:59:52 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > On Friday 13 December 2002 21.13, Steve Harris wrote: > [...] > > > What's missing? I thought about state() and decided this was > > > complete. Did I miss something? > > > > I think large numbers of states are overcomplicated myself. > > Yes - and the ones you have should be very strictly defined. The hard > part is to reduce the count without fogetting something...
Well LADSPA's been complete in my experience: instantiate -> activate -> <run> -> deactivate -> cleanup I'm not sure if run counts as a state, but, you get the idea. - Steve
