On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 08:09:18AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > also, to repeat the perennial advertisement, if your application has > no reason to attach itself to a particular audio interface and might > benefit from being able to route data to/from other applications, > consider using JACK (http://jackit.sf.net/). >
Which reminds me of some earlier thoughs: The whole discussion on XAP is about the in process plugin model if I'm correct. Why not include an out of process model like JACK? I suppose a union between JACK/LASDPA/XAP would be a good thing for the linux audio community. Of course things like callbacks are not quite handy for out of process plugins (unless using RPC stuff). I personally like the concept of being able to run various components in it's own process, it's own protected VM etc. just for the sake of robustness and ease of debugging. Frank. -- +---- --- -- - - - - | Frank van de Pol -o) A-L-S-A | [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\\ Sounds good! | http://www.alsa-project.org _\_v | Linux - Why use Windows if we have doors available?
