11/01/03 14:10, Conrad Parker wrote: > (one bit LADSPA sidechain proposal below ;)
[sni] > Now, how about if we add a SIDECHAIN flag to LADSPA_PortDescriptor (ie. > appropriately use one of the 28 bits still available there): > > #define LADSPA_PORT_SIDECHAIN 0x10 > > #define LADSPA_IS_PORT_SIDECHAIN(x) ((x) & LADSPA_PORT_SIDECHAIN) [snip] > I reckon this would give us what users expect, completely backwards > compatible, without breaking existing plugins or hosts. > > Conrad. > www.metadecks.org Sounds good to me. Maybe I'd prefer a name like CONTINUOUS_CONTROL to SIDECHAIN though (although that is also confusing because it applies to an audio port). -- The GNOME U sound editor: http://awacs.dhs.org/software/gnusound
