On Wednesday 15 January 2003 04.01, Paul Davis wrote: > i'd like to remind the folks involved in the XAP discussion that it > would be really, really, really useful to get some summary > documentation on where the design process stands and what has been > accomplished thus far. if you can provide this, i will need it by > 3pm EST on thursday at the absolute latest.
Ouch. Well, unless someone's been busy, we'll need to write something virtually from scratch. Either way, how much detail would be needed? I suppose one should at least mention the timestamped events, control ramping, the decoupling of note ID from note pitch and that kind of stuff, but at this point, I don't think we have enough stuff finalized, or enough time to write about the details. > also, for folks here who are not on ardour-dev, please critique > this: > > http://www.op.net/~pbd/brochure.pdf I think the list of highlight would look cleaner with bullets and left justified text, and I'm not sure about the horizontal separator bar crossing the vertical one on the first page. Other than that, it looks great! //David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate .- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------. | Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. | | RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. | `---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -' --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
