On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:17:40 +0100, David Olofson wrote: > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 05.09, David Olofson wrote: > > So, it seems like we'll need that 0 test anyway. It should > > obviously apply the target value instantly, so that later events > > will work even if they land at the same timestamp. It doesn't have > > to set the delta at all, as sending a 0 duration means you *have* > > to send another event with the same timestamp anyway. > > Another idea: > Since we need that (duration == 0) test anyway, why not have it > explicitly stop ramping as well, so we can connect non-ramped outputs > to ramped inputs and vice versa?
I'd say that has different semantics, and so should be a seperate event. Say... SET ;) > This doesn't interfere with normal operation, and it seems rude and > pointless to enforce ramping on all FP ins and outs, just to > guarantee punishment if you break the rules while ramping. :-) Sure. - Steve
