> >(btw, why jackd doesn't read /etc/jackrc or ~/.jackrc ?) > > because that means we have a config file, which means we need a config > file parser, which means we need to replicate a bunch of code or link > against another library. if jackd was a commonly executed command for > users, i could justify that. as it is, i can't.
I would support adding another library. I think both system and user configuration files add a lot to the usability department. BTW, the standalone non-jackd libjack sounds like a very good idea! -- Fernando
