On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 02:52:54 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > * Process mode: Mixed/RT/Off-Line. > > do we really want anything like this? I have a 1-10 'quality' level.
Not the same thing. I think offline processing allows seek, reverse etc. > > > * Hosts assume all plugins to be in-place broken. Why? > > > > It doesn't really matter what the default is as long as you can override > > it. That way is probably safer. > > Do we want to do this for XAP? I'd kind of hoped that XAP would dictate > that all plugins must be in-place safe. Its very inconvienient for certain algorithms. The plugin doesn't know ahead of time how big the buffer is going to be, so it cant prealoocate an intermediate buffer. > From: David Olofson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Instruments: have no inputs (in general) and overwrite output > Effects with #ins = #outs: overwrite their output with: > (input * dry) + (fx * wet). > > We can standardize a wet/dry gain control pair. But this becomes something > every plugin needs to provide. Uggh. Mix is not the same as wet/dry. Imagine you have an effect with an inherant delay of 64 samples, the dry output is the input delayed by 64 samples. - Steve
