On Tuesday 04 February 2003 21.17, Tim Hockin wrote: > > Overall PTAF is supprisingly similar to XAP (which is > > encouraging), there are just some differences in emphasis. Us LAD > > people tend to be simplecity freaks. I think its one of the > > really good things about LADSPA. > > I think that if we can reach common ground, we can all benefit. > I'd love to count OhmForce as a partner for pushing XAP, and > they'll benefit from having us if they want to enter Linux land.
Yes, that's a very good point that I forgot to make when I had the chance before! I think teaming up with Ohm Force could sort of break the ice. Demonstrate to other companies that Free/Open Source and commercial developers *do* have common interests, and that we can all benefit from some cooperation. This certainly wouldn't hurt if we intend to get involved in the GMPI effort. (And we do, right?) > We just need to decide what we can bend on, and what we can get > them to bend on :) Yeah. That's why we're here, isn't it? :-) And if I haven't said so already, I'm glad to see Ohm Force represented around here, showing interest in our ideas and opinions. This definitely feels like things are moving in the right direction. //David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate .- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------. | Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. | | RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. | `---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -' --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
