>Perhaps you would reconsider having JACK use constant (frames) >callbacks?
we debated the concept of non-constant callback sizes on jackit-dev, and there seemed to be strong support for using a constant value. this doesn't necessarily preclude process() being called with *less* than the "expected" size, but the current API docs/notes say that its always constant size. i don't know what people's thoughts are on "constant or less than the constant" for the callback. i imagine it will push complexity out into any clients that do FFT and other similar transforms. --p
