On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:33:40 +0100, Martin Voelkel wrote: > Martin Voelkel writes: > > i could not found any hint about the license of matt wright's library, > > he always says "OpenSource", which is not necessarily "free". will > > ask him about this. > > o.k. each file says: > > >> > Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and distribute modified versions > of this software and its documentation without fee and without a signed > licensing agreement, is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright > notice, this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies, > modifications, and distributions. > << > > could this be treated as "free"? don't know enough about those > licensing issues...
I think that the "without fee" part causes problems with the GPL, but IANAL. - Steve
