> and that seems strange? ;-) no, though in the past i have been amazed sometimes :-)
> the -ac changelog. To me, it's trivial to patch the rejects, but to > someone that isn't all that excited about it, it can be daunting. sure, but getting the rejects to patch does not mean that the patch is complete... i mean, new code paths might have been added that require new stuff to be added in the patch, especially since such a long time has passed between 2.4.20 and 2.4.21 anyway, i talked to andrew morton, and he suggests that it is better to go for 2.5.x ... maarten
