On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:23:07PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >The latter. If you read the whole thing, it's pretty clear even from that > >link that "tailored to fit the needs of the Digidesign end user" > >means nothing more than "it's a versatile microphone". > > more than that, it probably means "its not a particularly good > microphone for anything in particular, but you might like it because > its not particular bad either and it comes in the box".
Actually given BLUE's reputation I suspect it's an excellent mic. There are plenty of good versatile microphones. Think how many things a U47 has been successfully pointed at, or an RCA-77, or a Sennheiser 421, or an EV RE-20, or even an SM-57, or (insert your favorite small-diaphragm condenser). And all of those have particular jobs that they excel at. But I don't for a second believe that this mic has any special affinity with Digi hardware. This is pure marketing and packaging for both companies. -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com Look! Up in the sky! It's FUZZY SPECTACULAR ENGINEER! (random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
