On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 00:24, Stonekeeper wrote: > On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 19:01, Juan Linietsky wrote: > > It's not bad, but it's not really free (OpenSource), > > Generally, musicians don't give a toss whether something is > free(Opensource) or not (let the flaming begin). ...
OK ;) -<snip> Does it allow me to make good music?" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is the core question: Is it useful? This also goes for most of the people on this list: We are so much into constructing/dreaming up the impossible/inevitable > > > Also considering linux distros losing their binary compatibility > > every now and then, nobody ensures that this will continue working > > in the future. The guy has a point here: I spend an unreasonably amount of time getting GTK.1.2 to deliver approximately what most people (programmers) would have had expecteded. Recompiling for GTK.2.0 was a NO NO! because of all the kludges I invented. My source for the userinterface was practically _as_ unreadable as you can get. ( It is cleaned up now though, but had I gone elsewhere, then nobody would have cared! ). It is still so that gtk2 has higher demands on cpu than gtk1.x -<snip>-- > Just my pennies worth. Just my "Niclaus Wirth" :) cheers ( ) c[] // Jens M Andreasen
