At 29 Nov 2003 22:03:09 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > Roger Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > That's right. But, Paul and I have been working closely with this and > > > don't have much faith in the correctness of the 2.4 scheduler. > > > > Have you told kernel developers about this? > > This can be rather critical in embedded systems. > > No. It's rather difficult to prove. There's no "smoking gun". > > But, I have no reason to believe that it works correctly, and I > suspect that it probably does not.
as Roger pointed, the O(1) scheduler does quite simple tasks for RT processes. it *should* work. if it deson't work, it's a bug in the calculation of priority or so. anyway, it's nice for debugging, if you can reproduce it... Takashi
