Luke Yelavich: > > At 05:53 AM 14/01/2004, Nathaniel Virgo wrote: > > >I think another great application for such a thing would be a JACK patch > >bay. It would be so much easier to use something like this to connect > >apps (and internal ardour connections) than it is at the moment. I always > >wanted to write such a thing myself but never really had the time. In > >many ways a JACK patch bay would be one of the most demanding applications > >for this because it has to handle both many-to-one and one-to-many > >connections and JACK graphs can be very complicated, so I would suggest > >bearing it in mind while designing it, on the grounds that if it can > >handle that it will be able to handle many other things as well. I also > >think that having the option of embedding synth GUIs into the graph is > >very important. > > There already is. Check out http://qjackctl.sourceforge.net. >
Yes, it can do everything. But when having many many clients with lots of connections, it gets quite complicated. It would be nicer with a more loose patchbay type of pd/jmax/alsamodularsynth/etc. --
