On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:42:58PM +0000, Mike Rawes wrote: > With the exception of samples or other 'blob' data (e.g. IR impulses), I'm > fairly confident that a good modular could be constructed with LADSPA as it is. > I'm prepared to be proved wrong though!
You're probably right about this. But if I implement all I need using only the existing LADSPA interfaces, then at least one of the the following would be true: - the resulting modules would be technically compliant with the standard, but completely useless outside the AMS host, as there would be a lot of ports that carry AMS-specific data. - or the LADSPA compliant part would only contain *part* of a module (i.e. only the audio processing), and in that case nothing is gained, as LADSPA is used only as an internal interface. In fact this would just complicate module inplementation. -- Fons
