On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 20:52:29 +0000 Steve Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > Yes, but "well-known" port labels are very ladspa-y. eg. the latency > control out port, its not in the spec and it doesnt hurt any apps, but > it is a useful convention. > > We could define a meta-convention - something like: if the port label > begines with an _ then it should not generally be shown to users > (unless the app knows what its for and wants to expose it) as they > wont be able to do anything useful with it. Nice idea (having certain ports hidden from user) - but wouldn't it be better as a hint, for consistency with the rest of LADSPA? - Myk
