Previously: >There is a thread on Slashdot about Apples much hyped music production >thingie christened "GarageBand". > >It appears to me to be very inefficient. From what I can read, it >handles only a very few voices and very few audio-tracks. Actually, I >think it sucks! > >Anybody care to comment?
Huh... You sound envious actually... ;-) Why is everybody so busy trying to find fault with this thing? If it's so horrible, everybody can just ignore it, right? GarageBand is like anything else - the more tracks, the more softsynths and the more amp models you add, the more cpu it uses. It's definitely the best product in the category though... -Doug (The price is right - can't argue about "free"...)
