On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 11:32 am, Tim Goetze wrote: > hmm. agreed of course about the complicated alternatives. i wasn't > aware that a separate plugin GUI becomes nigh mandatory, which i > must admit i find not to my greatest liking.
Only if you actually need the configure() stuff, which many plugins might not. But I agree it's not exactly ideal. Better ideas welcome. > i'm not too intimate with liblo/OSC, so sorry for asking an RTFM > question: does OSC provide some sort of alternative, textual > representation of configuration options? I don't think OSC knows anything about "configuration" as such, it's just a delivery mechanism for passing typed arguments to named methods. Steve's really the OSC nut though: I'm just happy that it's reasonably simple and it works. Chris
