Hi! Apparently our mailsever has been blacklisted by all-day-breakfast ... Damned script-kiddies :(
So, since this discussion is kind of relevant here, I try get the message thru anyway. Sorry Chris! On tor, 2004-04-29 at 16:11, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 2:19 pm, Jens M Andreasen wrote: > > I think I will not be really, totally happy before I see something > > like: > > > > void (*midi_msg)(LADSPA_Handle instance, > > unsigned byte msg[4]); > > This would be exactly equivalent to the existing run_synth(), would it > not? Mmm .. This would replace, I think, all of your considerations on how to extend LADSPA. It is (probably?) the only extension really needed. MIDI is a very powerful protocol, and the beuty is that the client needs only to implement those parts it needs to get going. For a synthesizer one can ignore start, stop and pause as well as SMPTE, but for a sequencer or arpeggiator timing would be the name of the game. As a synthesizer developer I *could*, if I wished so, implement running-status and thus discover that I have been disconnected, but it is not required ... mvh // Jens M andreasen > Chris >
