On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:28:42 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > For example: > > (<plugin> stands for the unique name of a plugin) > > /<plugin>/addport <name> > /<plugin>/port/<name>/range 0 10 > /<plugin>/port/<name>/default 5 > /<plugin>/port/<name>/unit octaves > > This is a trivial example of course, for a real format we'll have to > think about grouping, port types, etc.
I dont really see the avantage of this - control and description are seperate tasks, and not even closely related. OSC is also not equiped to describe the kind of graph structures you need to describe plugins - you could arbitrarily extend it, but what not use a language with native graph structures? - Steve
