On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:35:38PM +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote: > On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 11:04, Pelle Nilsson wrote: > > Marek Peteraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > ... > > > Second thing is that the way you percieve them shouldn't change as you > > > switch applications. Which is what VST perfectly fulfills - it provides > > > its own UI. > > > > If I have 100 LADSPA plug-ins installed and 3 LADSPA hosts, I'd rather > > spend my time learning the guis of the 3 host-applications than > > learning the different guis of 100 plug-ins. That a plug-in then has > > three different interfaces depending on in which application I use it > > isn't a problem. > > Well, no. As hosts only provide a slider for each parameter, there is > absolutely no layout, controls aren't organised in a logical way. No > visual clues - except a slider. All the parameters in all existing > ladspa plugins can be (and usually are) fundamentally different, but > you're only providing - a slider.(or a knob?) So you end up with 3x100. > Look at the tape delay ladspa plugin for instance.
thats why the galan library needs to be extended :) you can build custom UIs for all LADSPAs.... http://galan.sourceforge.net/eq-shot.png if the gfx is not painted by me it looks like: http://galan.sourceforge.net/anti-aliased-knobs.png -- torben Hohn http://galan.sourceforge.net -- The graphical Audio language
