On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 06:36:47 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:37:35 +0100
> Simon Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > inline float FlushToZero( volatile float f )
> > {
> > f += 9.8607615E-32f;
> > return f - 9.8607615E-32f;
> > }
> >
>
> There we go!!! That is an elegant solution.
Until the optimiser notices... but agreed its nicer. How much damage does
it do if you change one of the constant values slightly? The DC offset
would only occur at very low signals, so shouldn't affect feedback loops.
- Steve
