* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For all the > > other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much. > > Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for > debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites > are preemptible anyway.
nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for
this.
Ingo
