On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 13:00, Steve Harris wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:35:01PM -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > If you've already implemented a system it might not be worth changing, > > but writing OSC server/clients is _really_ easy if you use liblo (which > > is what I've been doing for the last day or two). > > Good, I was aiming for an API which was as easy to use as possible, but > no easier ;) > > - Steve
Well, in a couple of hours I've managed to create a completely network-transparent remote controllable synth, so you succeeded in that regard. Liblo is awesome, nice work. Performance is my only concern now - have you done any latency benchmarks? I've decided to use OSC exclusively for all communication (including noteons) so latency is crucial. If you havn't I'd be glad to knock out a simple benchmark (or two) and share my results. -DR-
