On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:44, Robert Jonsson wrote: > > Getting off topic here, but there's a little more to it than that. 1 > > Syntactic sugared implementation is much much more preferable to 101 > > conventions for doing OOP with void pointers. > > Things like typesafety, getting rid of macros in favour of inline > > functions. The STL is another real reason to use C++ - the closest we have > > to a standard for that sort of stuff. UML etc... There are a lot of very > > practical reasons for using C++. > > Ahhh, I fear an outbreak of the unstoppable language zealot virus is imminent! > Once it gets airborne nothing can stop it! > > Ahh, it's probably already to late... I can hear the sound of eager fingers > tapping on keyboards... save yourselves!!
I can't say I've ever actually come across a C++ "zealot".. most seem to have an opinion similar to mine: C++ sucks. However, it sucks less than anything else I could use to do audio development on linux right now. -DR-
