On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 05:48:15 -0600, martin rumori wrote > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:03:18 +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote: > > > so if I'm writing a osc sequencer, is the best plan to leave the > > > mapping open for the user to modify? > > > > I would say so yes, its possible that an OSC schema spe will be > > standardised at soem point that would make it easier. > > not to mention the microtone-capabilities of your osc sequencer and > the sophisticated envelope control functions, which are hard to cover > with pure midi... :-))
thats what I'm after :) for anyone thats interested, I'm implementing a sequencer based on a text score language I've developed for algorithmic melody generation and live programming: http://www.pawfal.org/index.php?page=ScoreCode it sounds a bit strange maybe, but I managed to perform a prototype version of this live a couple of months ago, and it seems to work well. dave
