Previously: > I'm not even going to justify that with a response - you're putting > so many words into my mouth it's ridiculous.
<quotes> Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:42:44 -0500 From: Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer > We hardly have any right to complain if we don't even express > distaste with their newfound fascist strategy. Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:57:11 -0500 From: Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer > There are very valid technical reasons why a closed piece of hardware is > a POS from a Linux user's perspective. </quotes> And the implicit meanings of those two quotes are? > Anyway, read the email you're replying to again, note it's purpose, and > decide if replying as you did was really a good idea. Enough. Please. Can you help me by clarifying "it's purpose" [sic]...? Maybe I've got it all wrong - I thought you were just bitching because RME didn't give you something you wanted and you were trying to rally the LAD troops to create a big stink to try to get RME to give it to you... ;-) > The question is not "why limit yourself". I am not limiting myself. > RME is limiting me. (In a way. Don't go there) "Don't go there"? If you don't want me or anyone else to go there, why bother bringing it up in the first place? Are you trying to be a martyr? -Doug
