On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:02:43AM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:03 -0500, Dave Phillips wrote: > > > If I may chime in here... I urge all Linux audio developers to read the > > DSSI spec, it's well-written and directly addresses some of LADSPA's > > shortcomings. After working with VSTi plugins for a while I've begun to > > see the need for something similar in a native Linux architecture, and I > > think DSSI is an excellent way for us to get that. If you don't already > > know about it, you can learn more about DSSI here: > > > > http://dssi.sourceforge.net/ > > I second that. I love LADSPA and i appreciate its contribution to Linux > audio in general, and i'm still using it, but DSSI is better pretty much > any way you look at it. > > Hopefully the authors of LADSPA plugins will start porting their > software to DSSI.
For existing LADSPA plugins theres no need to port, if you want to add a DSSI-style UI you can, but theres no need to change the LADSPA pluign. - Steve
