Kai Vehmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My suggestion is that we drop this policy altogether: announcements should > be sent to LAA and optionally to LAD and/or LAU. At least I've always had > the nasty feeling that I'm spamming LAD+LAU with my Ecasound release > announcements. Of course, when announcing conferences, major new versions > (JACK-1.0.0 maybe? :)), etc, I see no harm in cross-posting to all the > three lists. > > So in other words, if you really want to see _all_ the announcements, > you should subcsribe to LAA. > > Any comments? If no objections, at least I will from now on send non-major > release announcements only to LAA.
why not subscribe LAD and LAU to LAA? then policy will be enforced automagically, no? -- Artem Baguinski: http://www.artm.org/ V2_Lab: http://lab.v2.nl/ V2_ Organisation for the Unstable Media: http://www.v2.nl/
