On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 21:51 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:35, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 13:17 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 12:28, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 14:41 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > > > > Read on here: > > > > > http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/bugtraq/2004-12/0390.html > > > > > > > > Wow, this is a HORRIBLE bug. > > > > > > Indeed. I tried it and it works. Someone should have been pointing a > > > camera at me to capture the "moment" :-) Spent the better part of > > > yesterday building new Planet CCRMA kernels without this "feature". > > > > Yes, fortunately realtime-lsm does not depend on the capability module. > > Still, I would expect that many audio users load it out of confusion. > > At least in FC3 the capability module is not a module, it is built into > the kernel. Thus the problem, the realtime lsm does not work (tried it) > if capability is built into the kernel, apparently the two modules can't > be stacked, it is one or the other. So, any low latency kernel that > wants to use realtime lsm is, I think, going to be affected.
No, the capability module that is referred to in the advisory is the POSIX capabilities module. I have this configured as a module on my system, but never load it, and realtime-lsm does not depend on it. realtime-lsm only depnds on the "commoncap" module. Lee
