tisdagen den 4 januari 2005 21.57 skrev Chris Cannam: > On Tuesday 04 Jan 2005 20:20, Dave Robillard wrote: > > Personally, I think it's a disgusting waste of time and effort to > > make every stereo plugin have to have a mono->stereo sibling. It > > just /screams/ bad solution. > > I agree, it sounds ridiculous -- on first hearing at least. I'm going > to have to go and read some of this ardour-dev discussion (it's not a > list I subscribe to) and see if it makes any more sense to me then. > > I realise it's not easy (or even always possible) to do the Right Thing > in the host -- my own host has some way to go too -- but I don't > understand why it should be better to create dozens of spurious plugins > than to give the user the information they need and let them decide how > a plugin should be handled.
In ardour, which allows for any channel configuration I guess this might be harder. In MusE only 1 and 2 channels are supported at the moment, in which case it is simpler, atleast that's how I interpret it. 1. Insert a mono plug on a stereo track and both channels will be mixed into the plugin. 2. Insert a stereo plugin into a mono track and it will be split to both inputs. /Robert > > > Chris -- http://spamatica.se/music/
