On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:49:42PM +0000, Chris Cannam wrote: > For example, Rosegarden contains structure intended to support things > like arbitrary layout engines for editing; multiple different layouts > on the same music data; event-based systems that are not MIDI, and so > on. Yet because it has taken so much development work just to do the > basic MIDI and audio support that people expect from a sequencer, and > because we are so few developers, most of this is still unused.
And unknown I suspect. If indeed the internals of Rosegarden offer so much scope for new developments, they should make a good subject for a presentation or even a workshop at LAC. -- FA
