On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:22:50PM +0100, martin rumori wrote: > hi arnold, > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:12:19PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote: > > I had a look into Steve Harris' liblo and libOSC++. The later seems more > > appealing to me since I am a C++-Guy. > > two years ago, i added the network classes (Inet*) to libOSC++, fixed > some bugs, cleaned up a bit... the library was used in different > projects (http://listen.gmd.de, http://www.grenzenlosefreiheit.de, > plus the wiretap thing of the original libOSC++ developers) and > appeared to be stable. > > BUT: as far as i know, there is not much development ongoing at the > moment, and i ever planned some redesign for the whole library (i > don't consider using a std::string as container for an osc message as > a nice example for object oriented design...), but unfortunetaly there > wasn't enough time...
There was some months ago, as thats where liblo's pattern matching code came from. > just some background information concerning libOSC++. be sure to pick > the "fraunhofer" branch if using it. there is a download page at > http://libosc.rumori.de > > but i guess that liblo might be the better choice, it's in vivid > development and used by much more projects than libOSC++, plus the > clean and rock solid design with the steve harris (R) guarantee... *cough* well the design may be ok in places, but the codebase is not exactly bug-free :) - Steve
