>It would be better to use poll with two objects: the sequencer, and >some pipe or something like that used for communication between >threads.
although i use this model as a basic pattern in ardour and other software, i think it might be worth asking fons exactly what other approaches he can imagine? it appears he might like something along the lines of snd_seq_poke(), which would cause the poll on the sequencer fd to return with POLLHUP or something related in the event set. fons? --p
