On Thu, 2005-12-05 at 12:39 -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote: > Alfons Adriaensen wrote on Thu, 12-May-2005: > > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:40:51AM -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote: > > > > > No, i mean the arguments the engine will use in the callbacks > > > are conventionally specified in the OSC "API" for these comms. > > > > Sorry but this still escapes me... Could you give an example ? > > OK, check out http://essej.net/sooperlooper/doc_osc.html > and look at the Get parameters section, and the register for control > changes section. Sorry for the confusing terminology, it's really > pretty simple.
FWIW, Om's OSC documentation (in both directions) is also online: http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/engine_osc_namespace.html http://www.nongnu.org/om-synth/client_osc_namespace.html An OSC note standard would be nice, but I don't know if it's even possible (it's different for everyone). Service discovery and namespace enumeration need to just make it a nonexistant problem IMO. -DR-
