Fons Adriaensen wrote on Thu, 12-May-2005: > You also allow the client to include a return address and OSC path > with each request. I have my doubts about the first: it allows the > client to use a different address for each call, and this could create > significant overhead for the server, having to lookup the hostnames. > The OSC return path probably makes sense in a dynamic environment as SL. I can't see why a single client would be changing its address all the time in practice. And a given hostname is only looked up once, and the address info used by liblo is cached. When I implemented this interface liblo did not yet support the source address feature, and it still doesn't work right on OS X for me.
jlc
