>From: Alfons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>IFF JACK could be modified to allow this then probably you wouldn't 
>need M, its function would be taken care of by jackd.

That was the idea.

>The problem with such a scheme could be that the load is not spread
>evenly, so it would be necessary to give those clients that use 
>longer buffers a lower priority. There may be other troule hidden
>somewhere...

Yes. The priority should depend on the buffer size.
Longer buffers would run with non-soft-RT schdulers.

Juhana
-- 
  http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-graphics-dev
  for developers of open source graphics software

Reply via email to