Es geschah am Sonntag 05 Juni 2005 04:18 als Erik de Castro Lopo schrieb: > I also find Ocaml a better high level language than Python because > it is strictly and statically typed as well as compiling to native > binaries which come close to the speed of C. The (very flawed IMO) > language shootout puts Ocaml compiled to native binaries as faster > than C++ but slower than C.
Hooo, that is a very brave claim, because it implies C++ binaries to be slower than _equivalent_ C binaries. I wonder if you can proof it or if you really compared it with todays C++ compilers. > > Browsing the site, the tutorial shows code lines ending with two > > semicola and assignments using a 'let' operator; first bitter pills > > to swallow for a friend of code brevity to be sure. > > The syntax does have a few warts, but IMO no more than C++. Which isn't hard, is it? CU Christian
