> > The controllers should not send a change back to the M when they are told > > by > > the M what their value is. > > The whole point about Paul's scheme is that he *is* doing exactly that. > And while does seem odd, I will not dismiss the idea without giving it > a full-length meditation :-) > > > You'll also want some logic in the M that says "if I receive a change that > > tells me to go to my current value, then don't send updates to anyone". > > This should be a rare occurence, so I wonder if it's worth the extra code.
that was precisely what my code did, though :)
