On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 14:58 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote: > Paul Davis: > > most of the ALSA sequencer's > > capabilities are redundant, which is compounded > > because it currently has > > no way of providing sufficiently accurate scheduling > > You say this as if it were self-evident, when it's been > the subject of much of this thread. _Does_ it have > no way of providing sufficiently accurate scheduling? > If not, why not?
i guess it all depends on one's definition of "sufficient". my take is that there are several MIDI h/w boxes that guarantee MIDI delivery to a resolution that matches the wire protocol (1/3msec). until we have scheduling capabilities that match this (or better), i don't feel comfortable calling them "sufficient".
