On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:48:50 +0100, Esben Stien wrote: > Tim Goetze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Please enlighten me! > > RDF, so it's possible to categorize it and look it up quickly;). > > OT: I think it's wrong to write the type names as plurals. A formal > categorization should not use plurals. It's the "Generator" group, not > the "Generators" group, f.ex.
Its a perosnaly preference thing, rdf types are classes, and in english you talk about the "class of generators"*. But, the RDF type URIs are just symbols for machine consupmtion, they have (should have?) labels that can be used for display purposes, and they can read whatever you like. * though I generally use the singular, dunno why I chose plural that day - Steve
