On Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 12:31:09PM +0000, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: > Julian Storer wrote:
yeah, this is good news , a windows/mac developer who has ventured into the fray. awfully rare in this day and age. to most of these people, its as if this world doesnt exist. > >Am I right in assuming that by default you mean the "plughw:" devices? > >On my machine the plughw: device glitched constantly, but the hw: > >devices worked really well. There was also some other reason I chose > >that.. can't remember offhand what it was though. > "default" means just that. use the name "default" instead of plughw:.... > or hw:0,0 > If the device glitched when using "plughw:" then it is a bug in ALSA or > your application. > How is you application deciding on sample rate? > > There is no sensible reason to ever use the "hw:0,0" device. Always use > the "plug:front" and friends. > If an application only works with "hw:0,0" it has been written wrongly. > > James > > P.S. Please don't top post. what does this mean. put the reply below the quoted content? in most readers i can think of off the top of myy head, the top is the best place to put a reply,. since it is more likely to show up in a brief synopsis, ,and not require paging down.. but then most of the world likes to prewrap their messages which is annoyingly narrow on a big screen or suffers from linebreak-hell on a cellphone, , so i guess i'll remain on the fringes of acceptability > > > > This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended > recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential > information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, > disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an > intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any > attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
