On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:56:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > course it would be perfectly valid for netjack > > to use little endian `on the wire'; but this would be like > > putting my powerbook in little endian mode when playing a > > wav file. sort of. > > so you say that i should not htonl the floats i copy from > my net buffer to the jack-port ?
no, it was a joke. > i doubt, this is a great performance impact. i doubt that too. > when i change the packet format next time, i could change that to byte > swap on a PPC. but considering that PPCs are generally slower than x86 > nowadays, this would create more cpu load on a jack-network. i don't think that's measurable either because the byte swap is probably not the main source of overhead. besides, i'm on ppc, so plz plz don't change it :) thanks for netjack! <sk>
