On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 21:02 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote: > In Apr 10 A.D. 2006 Paul Davis scripsit: > > > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 12:26 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote: > > > > > If you want this in C++, you definitely want to use libsigc++. > > > > > > (Keyword definitely) > > > > actually, its worse than that. if you do this in C++ and you do not use > > libsigc++, then a team of ninja open source developers will enter your > > house overnight and eviscerate your internal organs. you cannot run, you > > cannot hide. please, don't take chances. use libsigc++ for the sake of > > your family and loved ones. > > > > Well, how could I do anything USEFUL in c++ and not use libstdc++, if I have > any brains left? - Or do you refer to some special capabilities of libstdc++, > that provide for the task at hand?
libsigc++ != libstdc++
