On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 08:04:35PM +0200, Leonard paniq Ritter wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 06:48 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > > > if it never refuses then its ok with me ;) > > > > It's certainly allowed to refuse, it would just be bad manners, unless the > > host has ignored the required features list. > > so required features have to be checked on both sides. isn't that > redundant?
SupportedFeatures is not just fo requirements. eg. Fon's plyphonic control ports can work around the case where the host doesnt support it. > furthermore, surely there are other reasons why instantiation could > fail. how can the host determine the reason for which a plugin refused > to instantiate? It can't. Meh. > > > alternatively the host could be required to chdir to the bundle folder > > > before the plugin is being instantiated? > > > > Thats likely to cause all manner of excitement. > > the erotic kind of excitement? ;) More the running around screaming kind ;) - Steve
