On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote: > > Well, that's a little like saying 'Would you rather go to McDonalds or > that new burger joint nobody knows that might be a lot better but also > might be a lot worse?' > > Perhaps if a new name is to be decided the benevolent dictator should > simply decide a new name is to be given and it is up to us to decide which.
I don't think thats particularly helpful. There's not any agreement even amongst people who dont think that LADSPA is a good name what a good name is. So, I think saying "We can't use LADSPA2" wouldn't be especially benevolent :) That said, its up to the original LADSPA authors. - Steve
